Friday, December 23, 2011

How old was Jesus when the wise men came?



How old was Jesus when the wise men came?


Some imagine, much like a nativity scene often appears, that the wise men were on the scene at the same time as the shepherds.


Others say that Jesus was probably several years old or even back at home in Nazareth by the time the wise men arrived.


Let's take a look and see what we can find out.

Where to look?
Matthew 2
Luke 2:1-40
Leviticus 12

If we read these whole passages, we can piece together a picture from them.  First we'll figure out what is clear and then see what else may be inferred.  After that I will offer a conclusion.


What is clear:

- We know that Jesus was born in Bethlehem (Luke 2:4-7) ...
- and that he, Mary, and Joseph remained there for his circumcision on the 8th day (Luke 2:21) ...
- and that they h also remained until after their purification according to the Law at 40 days (Luke 2:22-24; Lev. 12:3- 4,6).
- We know that the wise men visited Jesus while they were still in Bethlehem (Matt. 2:8) …
- and that Joseph, Mary and Jesus left Bethlehem very soon after the wise men left (Matt. 2:13-15).
- We also know that when Herod did not hear back from the wise men, he ordered that all male children in the region of Bethlehem two years old and younger be killed, based on what he knew from the wise men (Matt. 2:16).

From this we know that Jesus had to have been between 40 days and 2 years old when the wise men came.


Can we make an educated guess at a narrower age range based on anything else in the text?

What can be inferred:

- When Herod had all male children in the area of Bethlehem 2 years and under killed, that likely does not mean that he believed Jesus was 2 years old. He would have been trying to hit a wide enough age range to ensure that he would get his target. If he knew for sure that Jesus was 2 years old, he would have only had all 2 year old male children killed, or perhaps 1 to 3 year old's to be safe. But the fact that the age range selected was newborn to 2 years suggests that Jesus was likely well inside of the 2 year limit.
- Luke 2:39: “And when they had performed everything according to the Law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own town of Nazareth.” This verse implies that they left for home (though they had to escape to Egypt first [Matt. 2:13-15]) not long after they had offered sacrifice at the temple following the 40 days of purification. This would make sense of course. Their home town was Nazareth (Luke 2:4,39). The only reason they went to Bethlehem in the first place was because of the census (Luke 2:1-5). But, while they were there, Mary gave birth (Luke 2:6) and they stayed around to take care of the customs related to that (Luke 2:21-24). After that was all taken care of it would make sense for them to go back home since their reasons for being there were done (Luke 2:39).
- Luke 2:2-4 – The asking of the wise men for “he who has been born” and Herod's inquiry of “where the Christ was to be born” may imply a relative nearness of time to the birth.
- “Child” vs. “Baby” – Some have made issue about Jesus being called a child at the visit of the wise men (Matt. 2:11) as opposed to being called a baby as he was called when the angels announced his birth to the shepherds (Luke 2:12). But the use of these words do not distinguish the age as much as some might think because he is also called “child” in the account of the shepherds at his birth (Luke 2:17) and called “child” twice in the account of him being brought to the temple after the 40 days of purification (Luke 2:27, 34).


My conclusion:

The wise men arrived when Jesus was at least within the range of 40 days to 2 years old, but likely much closer to the 40 days mark, perhaps even very close to 40 days.


What do you think?






Wednesday, May 30, 2007

"Abstain from all appearance of evil."

"Abstain from all appearance of evil."

How many times have you heard that verse quoted? I have heard it many times. I'm sure I've also said it myself. We interpret it to mean that we should abstain from anything that could appear to someone that we may be doing something evil/sinful.

But recently, at the men's Bible study that I attend, we accidentally and unexpectedly discovered that this is actually a misunderstanding of the text. We were discussing how to bring the gospel to lost people within their own subcultures, going out into the world to bring the truth of Jesus to the lost on their turf, when someone brought up the question, "What about abstaining from all appearance of evil?". None of us could remember the context of that familiar verse, so we looked it up. It turns out that most Bible translations translate it differently, shedding light on the familiar translation as to how it should be interpreted, which is quite different than how we are accustomed to understanding it.

The verse is I Thessalonians 5:22. Here is the verse in several common translations:

New International Version (NIV) - "Avoid every kind of evil."
New American Standard Bible (NASB) - "... abstain from every form of evil."
English Standard Version (ESV) - "Abstain from every from of evil."
New King James Version (NKJV) - "Abstain from every from of evil."
King James Version (KJV) - "Abstain from all appearance of evil."

Only the KJV reads as we are used to hearing it. In light of the modern English translations of the verse (and if you read it in context) it becomes clear what the intended meaning of the KJV was, which would have certainly been clear to readers when the version was younger. In modern English we would better understand the intended meaning of the word "appearance" as used in the verse if it were written something like this:

"Abstain from evil in every way it appears."

After thinking this through, I realized that it would be completely out of character for the Bible to command us to be so concerned with outward appearances. The Bible spends a lot of time calling us to not focus on outward appearances -- which is our natural tendency.

Jesus was not concerned with "the appearance of evil" as we have misunderstood it, but only with doing what was right. The life of Jesus was characterized by faithfulness to the Father's will without concern of how it would appear to others. God the Son, pure and holy, came to this sinful, corrupt Earth via a questionable birth as an apparently illegitimate child. He hung out with lots of questionable people and did lots of questionable things. He was called "a glutton and a drunkard", and "a friend of tax collectors and 'sinners'." His life was filled with "questionable" moments, though all of them were righteous.

Knowing this, let us follow Jesus by seeking to do God's will as we reach others without being concerned about appearances.